The “Stand Your Ground Law” has recently taken center stage
in wake of the Trayvon Martin Case in which George Zimmerman was acquitted. Many protesters are calling for a repeal of
the law stating that it allows “-- and
perhaps [encourages] -- violent situations to escalate in public, such laws
undermine public safety." (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/17/nra-blasts-holder-for-attacking-stand-your-ground-laws-after-zimmerman-verdict/#ixzz2ZVTyhDWA).
There are both opponents and proponents for the
law which has stirred up debate as to what constitutes self-defense and racial
profiling. The Florida Statutes states that a person who has right to believe
their life or the life of another is in danger has the right to defend
themselves if “The person against whom the defensive force was
used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had
unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or
if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that
person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and (b) The
person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful
and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred” (http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html).
There is no mention to public domain that is occupied when the self-defense/altercation
occurs. This is where people tend to get outraged as in the case of Trayvon
Martin. It is natural for someone to want to protect their home or other
dwelling and the people that occupy it. However, if someone is in public
domain, why wouldn’t the accosted flee and seek help? Excessive force does not necessarily
constitute self-defense. It can lead to unnecessary violence when a perception
of danger is misconstrued.
Proponents
for the law, such as the NRA, believe the law backs up the fundamental right of
each person to protect themselves and their dwelling. Attorney General Eric
Holder expressing his concerns states, “…in
his speech to the NAACP, suggested that the laws encourage gun owners to seek
confrontation rather than avoid it” (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/17/nra-blasts-holder-for-attacking-stand-your-ground-laws-after-zimmerman-verdict/#ixzz2ZVYDSXSz).
When carrying a
weapon, a person can tend to feel justified to use deadly force when
threatened; however, what comes into question becomes what is the danger being
faced?
No comments:
Post a Comment